While I can write scripts to parse and separate the addressing, it would be pretty neat to have an ipv4.can, ipv4-silent.can, ipv6.can, ipv6-silent.can to keep it all clean.
By suggesting this feature, I accept your scorn if you feel this is unworthy of your time.
Re: Feature Request / Suggestion - ip.can
By: WitNik to Digital Man on Mon Nov 09 2020 02:31 pm
While I can write scripts to parse and separate the addressing, it would be pretty neat to have an ipv4.can, ipv4-silent.can, ipv6.can, ipv6-silent.can to keep it all clean.
By suggesting this feature, I accept your scorn if you feel this is unworthy of your time.
Seems like a fine idea and likely not too difficult to implement.
By suggesting this feature, I accept your scorn if you feel this is unworthy of your time.
Seems like a fine idea and likely not too difficult to implement.
Added to my todo list.
Sysop: | Tandy |
---|---|
Location: | New York, USA |
Users: | 15 |
Nodes: | 13 (0 / 13) |
Uptime: | 01:00:02 |
Calls: | 340 |
Messages: | 120,725 |