There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for me to find it!

When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believe that it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.

I have one conference set to moderated but all nntp posts are marked moderated. If I remove the moderated conference from SCFG, then all appears to be ok and posts are posted properly unmoderated again.

Can anyone duplicate this problem just to make sure it's not me!

Merlin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merlin - Sysop of CarSo BBs - telnet://carso.dyndns.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
þ Synchronet þ CarSo BBs þ Beverley, UK þ telnet://carso.dyndns.org

Merlin wrote:

There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for me to
find it!

When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believe that
it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.

I have one conference set to moderated but all nntp posts are marked moderated.
If I remove the moderated conference from SCFG, then all appears to be ok and posts are posted properly unmoderated again.

Can anyone duplicate this problem just to make sure it's not me!

I commented out those lines in my copy... I beleive there are some changes
in sbbs to support this.. re-build from cvs... if you aren't running a
version built from cvs, then get the nntpservice.js from the 3.10j
package...

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Ryan | ICQ: 4935386
tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net | AIM/AOL: azTracker1
Roughneck BBS: | Yahoo: azTracker1
http://www.theroughnecks.net | MSN: (email address)
telnet://theroughnecks.net | Trillian: www.trillian.cc

---
þ Synchronet þ s3.bbs.us - Synchronet 3 Interface Designs

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Merlin to All on Sun Jan 05 2003 12:57 am

There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for me find it!

When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believe t it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.

The bug is actually in the version of SBBS you're running, not nntpservice.js. You need to go back to the version of nntpserivce.js that came with the version of SBBS you're using.

digital man

---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Digital Man to Merlin on Sun Jan 05 2003 02:06 am

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Merlin to All on Sun Jan 05 2003 12:57 am

There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for find it!

When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believ it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.

The bug is actually in the version of SBBS you're running, not nntpservice.j You need to go back to the version of nntpserivce.js that came with the vers of SBBS you're using.

Yes! I thought I was using the latest version that I compiled the other day, but it appears that someone (Me!) forgot to copy the newly compiled version to my sbbs/exec dir!

Merlin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merlin - Sysop of CarSo BBs - telnet://carso.dyndns.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
þ Synchronet þ CarSo BBs þ Beverley, UK þ telnet://carso.dyndns.org

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Merlin to Digital Man on Sun Jan 05 2003 02:14 pm

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Digital Man to Merlin on Su

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Merlin to All on Sun Jan 05 2003 12:57 am

There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex f find it!

When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I bel it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.

The bug is actually in the version of SBBS you're running, not nntpservic You need to go back to the version of nntpserivce.js that came with the v of SBBS you're using.

Yes! I thought I was using the latest version that I compiled the other day, but it appears that someone (Me!) forgot to copy the newly compiled version my sbbs/exec dir!

Merlin
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Merlin - Sysop of CarSo BBs - teln -------------------------------------------------------------------

HA! been there, done that...


"Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends"

Three Stooges Gentlemens Club - tsgc.dyndns.org - Las Vegas, Nv

---
þ Synchronet þ Three Stooges Gentlemens Club - Las Vegas, Nv

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Corey to Merlin on Sun Jan 05 2003 08:03 am

"Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends"

Is it just me, or does anyone else find taglines a source of great wisdom?...

I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible way to add mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?

C:\WINDOWS C:\WINdOWS\RUN C:\WINdOWS\RUN\SLOW


---
þ Synchronet þ IQ Land - Dead genius slowly striving to enter the land of the living

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Prime to Corey on Wed Jun 25 2003 11:15 pm

"Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends"

Is it just me, or does anyone else find taglines a source of great wisdom?..

I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible way to a mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?

I don't know about "always", but there is currently no foreseeable reason to remove Baja support.

digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #33:
Termites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock music!

---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: nntpserve bug?
By: Prime to Corey on Wed Jun 25 2003 23:15:00

I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible way to a mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?

When the JS support is finally complete ( imagine the need for BAJA will wither away. Perhaps eventually it will be removed from the codebase (as was dial-up support). But I would expect (and advise) that a lengthy period pass before that happen.

Of course DM may tell you his precise plans...

---
þ Synchronet þ Where we BAJA Rob into writing our modules. The ANJO BBS

Angus wrote:

I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible
way to a mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?

When the JS support is finally complete ( imagine the need for BAJA
will wither away. Perhaps eventually it will be removed from the codebase (as was dial-up support). But I would expect (and advise) that a lengthy period pass before that happen.

Of course DM may tell you his precise plans...

AFAIK rob doesn't intend on removing baja support... but I personally don't
see it really advancing at all.. pretty much anything new will be done in
JS... beyond that, JS is pretty complete, my board runs 99.99% JS, with
the only exception being the small stub to load my command shell.

In the S3 shell, there are still a couple of things in the file section
that will launch baja commands on the fly, simply because I am not sure
how they are supposed to work in js, or that they work in js properly.

arrays, and oo-code are probably the two biggest reasons imho to jump
to js... (finally getting some time to work on my bbs this weekend.)
may come up with something, or some things that are new. :)

--
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net icq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email)

---
þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net, where the men are men, and the women like it